Greg> I actually came up with an idea for that, slightly too late to get Greg> considered in the original lockstep-iteration debate: Greg> for (x in seq1, y in seq2): Greg> ... That's already valid syntax though. Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4