Brett Cannon wrote: > Because the AST code at the C level represent the 'op' value as > basically an enumeration value, not a string. So creating an object > is somewhat easier then trying to do the conversion to an interned > string. It would seem even easier (and a lot faster) to use an array to go from C enum --> some object, which could as well be an interned string as anything else. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4