Georg Brandl schrieb: > >> a.([b]) > No. (you can't write a([b]) today) Actually, you can, but it means something > >> a . [ b ] > Yes. (you can write a . b today) OTOH, you can't write x + = 2 or a = 2 * * 4 so it's not that obvious that .[ should be two tokens. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4