On 2/12/07, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne at gmail.com> wrote: > Is even more syntactic sugar really what Python really needs? Yes, I need my fix!!! my 2 cents: I'm +1 on either the '.(name)' or '.[name]' syntax. I'm leaning more towards the parentheses though. I don't really buy into the argument that people will confuse it for a function call. That seems like more of an argument against the dot operator in general than the new syntax. I'm -1 on the '->' syntax. It just doesn't look very clean to me. -Farshid
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4