RetroSearch Browse

Mon Feb 12 04:53:22 CET 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-February/070945.html

On 2/11/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> Brett Cannon schrieb:
> > On 2/11/07, skip at pobox.com <skip at pobox.com> wrote:
> >> Someone checked in Parser/Python.asdl.  After rebuilding Subversion tells me
> >> that Python/Python-ast.c has been modified.  I assume the two are related.
> >> Did whoever checked in the former need to check in the latter
> >
> > Yeah, sorry about that.  It took a ``make distclean`` for it to get
> > regenerated for me.  I checked in the updated version.
>
> Actually, the regenerating should happen immediately after commit,
> as this bumps the revision number of the asdl file. This means
> you have to make two commits per AST grammar change: one to change
> the grammar, and the other to update the regenerated file.
>

Revision 53751 adds a comment to Python-ast.c about this now, along
with putting __version__ in the header as well.

-Brett

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-February/070945.html below:

[Python-Dev] Does Python/Python-ast.c need to be checked in?