A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-February/070938.html below:

[Python-Dev] Does Python/Python-ast.c need to be checked in?

[Python-Dev] Does Python/Python-ast.c need to be checked in? [Python-Dev] Does Python/Python-ast.c need to be checked in?Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Mon Feb 12 00:02:24 CET 2007
On 2/11/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> Actually, the regenerating should happen immediately after commit,
> as this bumps the revision number of the asdl file. This means
> you have to make two commits per AST grammar change: one to change
> the grammar, and the other to update the regenerated file.

Is this documented somewhere? It wouldn't hurt if there was a pointer
to that documentation right next to the line in Python-ast.c that gets
modified by the regeneration. (I've been wondering about this a few
times myself.)

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4