Op dinsdag 11-12-2007 om 17:03 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Guido van Rossum: > On Dec 11, 2007 4:54 PM, Jan Claeys <lists at janc.be> wrote: > > Op vrijdag 07-12-2007 om 07:26 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Sean > > Reifschneider: > > > I would say that this is an optimization that helps a specific set of > > > platforms, including one that I think we really care about, the OLPC > > > which needs it for decreased battery use. > > > > Almost every laptop user would benefit from it, and even some desktop or > > server users might save on their electric power bill... > > Do you have data to support this claim? Not PyGTK-specific data, but you can see power-saving by reducing wakeups by playing with Intel's 'powertop' utility on linux (also see the "lesswatts" site mentioned earlier). One example was the interaction between PulseAudio & ALSA that caused a lot of "wakeups", and thus prevented laptops from going into the more "agressive" power saving modes; if PyGTK has a similar issue, that would make it less useful on laptops... -- Jan Claeys
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4