Guido van Rossum wrote: > Hm, Apple and Microsoft don't seem to think so. They go out of their > way to implement elaborate visual effects. Well, that's a different issue -- assuming the visual effect is something wanted, then the CPU required to produce it isn't unnecessary. But there's no excuse for using CPU when the application truly isn't doing anything other than waiting for something to happen. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4