A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-August/074081.html below:

[Python-Dev] make iter() return an empty iterator?

[Python-Dev] make iter() return an empty iterator? [Python-Dev] make iter() return an empty iterator?Facundo Batista facundobatista at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 15:01:47 CEST 2007
2007/8/3, Andrew Bennetts <andrew-pythondev at puzzling.org>:

> I don't really think there's much reason to make "iter()" work.  As you say,

What bad thing could happen if we make iter() work? If nothing, we
should ask ourselves: which is the more intuitive behaviour to expect
of iter()? To raise an exception or to return an empty iterator?

I'm +0 for the latter.

--
.    Facundo

Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4