Georg Brandl wrote: > Sure, you could use ``iter(())`` or ``iter([])``, but for consistency's sake > wouldn't it make sense for ``iter()`` to return an empty iterator, as ``str()`` > returns an empty string etc.? > > Georg There is a difference. >>> type(iter) <type 'builtin_function_or_method'> >>> type(str) <type 'type'> >>> type(int) <type 'type'> >>> type(list) <type 'type'> Cheers, Ron
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4