No need to worry about it, I fixed the failing test. Although it would be good to review the comments and make them more accurate. Take a look at the last change to test_pty.py. n -- On 4/29/07, Jerry Seutter <jseutter at gmail.com> wrote: > I was mucking about in test_pty.py not too long ago. I'll take a look. > > Jerry > > > On 4/24/07, Grig Gheorghiu < grig.gheorghiu at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This is happening both in the Python buildbot farm, and in the > > community buildbot farm. > > > > See: > > > > > http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/trunk/sparc%20solaris10%20gcc%20trunk/builds/1960/step-test/0 > > > http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/community/trunk/sparc%20Solaris%2010%20trunk/builds/484/step-test/0 > > > > Grig > > > > -- > > http://agiletesting.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Python-Dev mailing list > > Python-Dev at python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jseutter%40gmail.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/nnorwitz%40gmail.com > >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4