On 4/29/07, Tim Delaney <tcdelaney at optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> I've been intending to write up a PEP for fixing super, but I haven't had
> time to get to it.
Calvin Spealman has the most recent draft. I hope he will incorporate
this into his draft.
> 1. 'super' becomes a keyword, that returns a super object for the instance
> method currently being executed.
So it is a "keyword" in the sense that None is a keyword; not in the
stronger sense that "if" is a keyword?
> 4. super objects are callable, and calling them will execute the super
> method with the same name as the instance method currently being executed.
> Lookup of this method occurs when the instance method is entered.
>
> class A(object):
> def f(self):
> pass
>
> class B(A):
> def f(self):
> super() # Calls A.f(self)
> If you want name lookup to occur at the time of the call, you can explicitly
> specify the method name (just like with any other super attribute):
>
> class A(object):
> def f(self):
> pass
>
> class B(A):
> def f(self):
> super.f() # Calls A.f(self)
As long as you can be explicit, should the shortcut be a full
shortcut? That is,
def f(self, a, b=c, *args, **kwargs):
super() # passes the exact arglist that f got
vs
def __init__(self, myvar, passed_var):
super.__init__(self, passed_var) # flags that you are
changing the args
-jJ
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4