>> As I said - I'm not convinced that is indeed correct. Before accepting >> a replacement test I would like confirmation that this test will fail >> on 2.5.0. You might not get ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION in all cases of >> open files with 2.5.0. > > But i am running 2.5.0 during my entire writing of this patch. I've > not upgraded my laptop to 2.5.1 yet, although I verified against > another installation of 2.5.1 before publishing. And you saw your test pass? Then it is not a valid test case for the bug being test, because the bug is present in 2.5.0, so your test case should fail there. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4