Khalid A. Bakr schrieb: > For reference, this is the result of running the > regression tests of the official Python 2.5.1 (final) > on Win98. I think I saw it in the installtion screen > that Python 2.5 is the last release to support Win98. > > Even though the unicode tests failing might be > expected, what interested me was the fact that > test_1565150 of test_os failed. Details follow. Ah, ok. This means that the test is bogus. On Win95 (and, strictly speaking, NT+ installed on FAT), the test will certainly fail, because FAT has no subsecond resolution for file modification times (it doesn't even have second resolution - the granularity is 2s). This failure does not bother me much - os.stat itself works just fine on this system. If you want to contribute a patch to skip the test on W9x, please go ahead - but IMO, there is no harm done having this test fail on W9x for the rest of 2.5.x. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4