On 4/24/07, Talin <talin at acm.org> wrote: > Calvin Spealman wrote: > > I have not gotten any replies about this. No comments, suggestions for > > not skipping any missed threads, or corrections. Is everyone good with > > this or should I give it another day or two? > > Part of the issue, for me anyway, is that many of the really > "interesting" conversations have moved to Python-3000 and Python-ideas. > > That being said: There are a few threads in the "skipped" section that I > would have liked to understand better, without having to read through > all those messages, such as the various "decimal" threads. > > Other than that, the summaries remain very valuable. Thank you :) > > -- Talin > Yes, I plan to solve this by pulling them for summaries, as well. I'm not sure at the moment if its better to pull them into one summary or three. I would think one, with all the cross over that happens these days. Any opinions? -- Read my blog! I depend on your acceptance of my opinion! I am interesting! http://ironfroggy-code.blogspot.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4