A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-April/072660.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposal: Allow any mapping after ** in calls

[Python-Dev] Proposal: Allow any mapping after ** in calls [Python-Dev] Proposal: Allow any mapping after ** in callsGeorg Brandl g.brandl at gmx.net
Wed Apr 18 18:34:36 CEST 2007
Alexander Belopolsky schrieb:
> Python allows arbitrary sequences after * in calls, but an expression
> following ** must be a (subclass of) dict.  I believe * and ** should
> be treated similarly and since f(*UserList(..)) is valid,
> f(**UserDict(..)) should be valid as well.
> 
> Of course, I can work around this limitation by writing
> f(**dict(UserDict(..))), but this is unnatural given that I don't have
> to do f(*tuple(UserList(..))).
> 
> I have submitted a patch on SF that makes Python accept arbitrary
> mappings after **.

Ping! Nobody interested in this?

Georg

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4