RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 18 16:18:42 CEST 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-April/072659.html

Great -- if you target 2.6, it'll automatically be merged into 3.0 the
next time somebody runs svnmerge. (Thomas?)

--Guido

On 4/18/07, Jason Orendorff <jason.orendorff at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> > Perhaps a rewrite could target 3.0 and 2.6 could use a backported
> > version of this *if* py3k compatibility mode is enabled? I'd love to
> > see at least the 3.0 version cleaned up.
>
> A lot of these bugs can be fixed without forking.  I've been
> conservative so far.  I looked at a diff this morning.  Even
> pickled documents shouldn't break.
>
> If this patch lands, I can look at further cleanup after that.
>
> Thanks everyone,
> -j
>

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-April/072659.html below:

[Python-Dev] minidom -> new-style classes?