A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-April/072658.html below:

[Python-Dev] minidom -> new-style classes?

[Python-Dev] minidom -> new-style classes? [Python-Dev] minidom -> new-style classes?Jason Orendorff jason.orendorff at gmail.com
Wed Apr 18 14:26:23 CEST 2007
On 4/17/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> Perhaps a rewrite could target 3.0 and 2.6 could use a backported
> version of this *if* py3k compatibility mode is enabled? I'd love to
> see at least the 3.0 version cleaned up.

A lot of these bugs can be fixed without forking.  I've been
conservative so far.  I looked at a diff this morning.  Even
pickled documents shouldn't break.

If this patch lands, I can look at further cleanup after that.

Thanks everyone,
-j
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4