A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-April/072655.html below:

[Python-Dev] minidom -> new-style classes?

[Python-Dev] minidom -> new-style classes? [Python-Dev] minidom -> new-style classes?Collin Winter collinw at gmail.com
Wed Apr 18 04:51:34 CEST 2007
On 4/17/07, Jason Orendorff <jason.orendorff at gmail.com> wrote:
> Surely nobody is subclassing these classes.  You don't subclass DOM
> interfaces--the DOM doesn't work that way.  So this change should be
> OK.  Right?

People are definitely subclassing those classes:
http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=class%5Cs%2B.%2B%5C%28.*minidom%5C.&btnG=Search

Whether any of those uses will break if switched to new-style class, I
can't say.

Collin Winter
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4