Raymond Hettinger wrote: > Instead of a separate function in collections, it may be sensible to stick with > the familiar and provide a dictionary contructor for the commonly encounter use > case of counting things: I don't think that's a good idea. The dict class should restrict itself to being a general-purpose mapping object, and not become a catchall for utility functions that happen to return a dict. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4