RetroSearch Browse

Sun Apr 8 03:31:31 CEST 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-April/072508.html

On 4/7/07, Steven Bethard <steven.bethard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/7/07, Steven Bethard <steven.bethard at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here's a patch implementing collections.counts() as suggested above:
> >
> >      http://bugs.python.org/1696199
> >
> > Example usage, from the docstring::
> >
> >      >>> items = 'acabbacba'
> >      >>> item_counts = counts(items)
> >      >>> for item in 'abcd':
> >      ...     print item, item_counts[item]
> >      ...
> >      a 4
> >      b 3
> >      c 2
> >      d 0
>
> Guido commented in the tracker that it would be worth discussing
> whether that last item (``item_counts['d']``) should return 0 (as a
> defaultdict would) or raise KeyError (as a dict would).
>
> Anyone have a good motivation for one approach or the other?

I say 0 if it is really meant to represent a count as the absense of
something is 0.  The object returned is being viewed as an object
representing the count of items, not specifically as a dict.

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20070407/a14cfdf9/attachment-0001.html 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-April/072508.html below:

[Python-Dev] function for counting items in a sequence