On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:07:18PM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> This one was at least personally addressed
> (well, to "Python Contributors"), which is a step ahead of most of
> them.
What gets me is that such surveys are invalid because the respondents
aren't randomly selected -- they're the people who care enough to
answer. It would be more efficient and reliable to just go look at a
sampling of project web sites and look at their bug trackers, but that
requires effort from the student.
Recently I was interviewing a student who worked on a project that had
instrumented an IDE to record every operation (editing, saving, etc.)
in a database. I asked "so what did you learn from this data?", and
was told that no one has analyzed it; they're just *accumulating* the
data. It's stamp collecting as computer science.
--amk, who save his files every 87.4 seconds and types a character
every 2.3sec.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4