On 4/3/07, Christian Heimes <lists at cheimes.de> wrote: > > I'd be willing to look at adding it, if the group thinks it's the right > > thing to do. > > I like the idea and I'm proposing to add two more methods to subprocess > Popen. > > class Popen(...): > ... > def signal(self, signal): > """Send a signal to the process (UNIX only) > > signal is constant from the signal module > """ > > def terminate(self, force=False): > """Terminate the process > > On UNIX terminate(False) is equivalent to signal(SIGTERM) and > terminate(True) to signal(SIGKILL). > > On Windows ... (does Windows support a forced terminate?) > """ Another difference I believe is that TerminateProcess on Windows doesn't kill the tree of processes like kill would. It would be nice if Popen.terminate() did the same thing on both Unix and Windows. (I assume that would mean making *all* the appropriate TerminateProcess calls.) Steve -- I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity. --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4