Bob Ippolito schrieb: > My guess is that people do have this problem, they just don't know > where that memory has gone. I know I don't count objects unless I have > a process that's leaking memory or it grows so big that I notice (by > swapping or chance). Right. Although I do wonder what kind of software people write to run into this problem. As Guido points out, the numbers must be the result from some computation, or created by an extension module by different means. If people have many *simultaneous* copies of 0.0, I would expect there is something else really wrong with the data structures or algorithms they use. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4