Nick Craig-Wood wrote: > Is there any reason why float() shouldn't cache the value of 0.0 since > it is by far and away the most common value? 1.0 might be another candidate for cacheing. Although the fact that nobody has complained about this before suggests that it might not be a frequent enough problem to be worth the effort. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4