On 9/29/06, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne at gmail.com> wrote: > > > If there are "rampant criticisms" of the Python docs, then those that > > are complaining should take specific examples of their complaints to the > > sourceforge bug tracker and submit documentation patches for the > > relevant sections. And personally, I've not noticed that criticisms of > > the Python docs are "rampant", but maybe there is some "I hate Python > > docs" newsgroup or mailing list that I'm not subscribed to. > > Meh! The number one complaint IS that you have to take your complaints > to the sourceforge bug tracker and submit documentation patches. For > documentation changes, that is way to much overhead for to little > gain. But thankfully I think there are people working on fixing those > problems which is very nice. The PSF Infrastructure committe has already met and drafted our suggestions. Expect a post to the list on Monday or Tuesday outlining our recommendation on a new issue tracker. -Brett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060929/6760e511/attachment.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4