On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:49:35AM +0900, stephen at xemacs.org wrote: > What is lost according to him is information about how the elements of > a module work together. The docstrings tend to be narrowly focused on > the particular function or variable, and too often discuss > implementation details. I agree with this, and am not very interested in tools such as epydoc for this reason. In such autogenerated documentation, you wind up with a list of every single class and function, and both trivial and important classes are given exactly the same emphasis. Such docs are useful as a reference when you know what class you need to look at, but then pydoc also works well for that purpose. --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4