RetroSearch Browse

Sat Sep 23 21:12:05 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-September/068981.html

On 9/23/06, Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose that the AST format returned by passing PyCF_ONLY_AST
> to
> compile() get the same guarantee in maintenance branches as the bytecode
> format - that is, unless it's absolutely necessary, we'll keep it the
> same.
> Otherwise anyone trying to write tools to manipulate the AST is in for a
> massive world of hurt.
>
> Anyone have any problems with this, or can it be added to PEP 6?

Works for me.

-Bett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060923/f9620f0c/attachment.htm 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-September/068981.html below:

[Python-Dev] AST structure and maintenance branches