RetroSearch Browse

Tue Sep 19 06:15:50 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-September/068842.html

On 9/18/06, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
>
> Armin Rigo wrote:
>
> > My (limited) understanding of the motivation for relative imports is
> > that they are only here as a transitional feature.  Fully-absolute
> > imports are the official future.
>
> Guido does seem to have a dislike for relative imports,
> but I don't really understand why. The usefulness of
> being able to make a package self-contained and movable
> to another place in the package hierarchy without hacking
> it seems self-evident to me.

It is more of how relative imports used to be inherent and thus have no
clear way to delineate that an import was being done using a relative path
compared to an absolute one.

What's happening in Py3k? Will relative imports still
> exist?

Using the dot notation, yes they will exist in Py3K.

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060918/01e1a07e/attachment.htm 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-September/068842.html below:

[Python-Dev] New relative import issue