RetroSearch Browse

Sat Sep 16 22:32:55 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-September/068790.html

Nick Coghlan wrote:
> As for the reason: it makes it possible to use the same style for classes 
> without bases as is used for functions without arguments. Prior to this 
> change, there was a sharp break in the class syntax, such that if you got rid 
> of the last base class you had to get rid of the parentheses as well.

Is the result a new-style or classic-style class? It would be nice if 
using the empty parens forced a new-style class...

-- Talin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-September/068790.html below:

[Python-Dev] Grammar change in classdef