Tim Peters wrote: > upto, sep, rest > >in whatever order they apply. > In the rpartition case, that would be (rest, sep, upto) which seems a bit cryptic. We need some choice of words that clearly mean: * the chopped-off snippet (guaranteed to not contain the separator) * the separator if found * the unchopped remainer of the string (which may contain a separator). Of course, if a clear example is added, the choice of words becomes much less important. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4