On Tuesday 05 September 2006 13:24, Michael Chermside wrote: > How about something like this: > > S.partition(sep) -> (head, sep, tail) > S.rpartition(sep) -> (tail, sep, rest) I think I prefer: S.partition(sep) -> (head, sep, rest) S.rpartition(sep) -> (tail, sep, rest) Here, "rest" is always used for "what remains"; head/tail are somewhat more clear here I think. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4