> ISTM this is just begging for newbie (and maybe not-so-newbie) > confusion. Why not just document both as returning (left, sep, > right) which seems the most obvious description of what the methods > return? I'm fine with that (though it's a little sad that we think the rather basic concepts of head and tail are beyond the grasp of typical pythonistas). Changing to left/sep/right will certainly disambiguate questions about the ordering of the return tuple. OTOH, there is some small loss in that the head/tail terminology is highly suggestive of how to use the function when making succesive partitions. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4