Travis E. Oliphant wrote: > Greg Ewing wrote: >>What exactly does "bit" mean in that context? > > Do you mean "big" ? No, you've got a data type there called "bit", which seems to imply a size, in contradiction to the size-independent nature of the other types. I'm asking what size-independent information it's meant to convey. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4