Greg Ewing wrote: > Nick Coghlan wrote: >> I'd say the answer to where we put it will be dependent on what happens to the >> idea of adding a NumArray style fixed dimension array type to the standard >> library. If that gets exposed through the array module as array.dimarray, then >> it would make sense to expose the associated data layout descriptors as >> array.datatype. > > Seem to me that arrays are a sub-concept of binary data, > not the other way around. So maybe both arrays and data > types should be in a module called 'binary' or some such. Yes, very good point. That's probably one reason I'm proposing the data-type first before the array interface in the extended buffer protocol. -Travis
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4