Nick Coghlan wrote: > I'd say the answer to where we put it will be dependent on what happens to the > idea of adding a NumArray style fixed dimension array type to the standard > library. If that gets exposed through the array module as array.dimarray, then > it would make sense to expose the associated data layout descriptors as > array.datatype. Seem to me that arrays are a sub-concept of binary data, not the other way around. So maybe both arrays and data types should be in a module called 'binary' or some such. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4