Nick Coghlan wrote: > Greg Ewing wrote: >> Also, what if I want to refer to fields by name >> but don't want to have to work out all the offsets > Use the list definition form. With the changes I've > suggested above, you wouldn't even have to name the fields you don't > care about - just describe them. That would be okay. I still don't see a strong justification for having a one-big-string form as well as a list/tuple/dict form, though. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4