Anthony Baxter schrieb: > Subsequent release. This is still largely a manual process - I search for all > the references to the previous release, update them, then read through it for > missed bits. I then update the text bits that need to be changed. There's all > sorts of minor variations there - for instance, often in a non-final release, > we don't have an unpacked version of the documentation (but sometimes we do, > wah). If that's a source of pain, we can standardize (assuming you are talking about the .chm file). Which way would you like it? It really doesn't matter to me either way - I just didn't think of it causing problems. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4