Alexey Borzenkov wrote: >> any reason you cannot just use the "subprocess" module instead, like >> everyone else? > > Oh! Wow! I just simply didn't know of its existance (I'm pretty much > new to python), and both distutils and SCons (I was looking inside > them because they are major build systems and surely had to execute > compilers somehow), and upon seeing that each of them invented their > own method of searching path created a delusion as if inventing custom > workarounds was the only way... Sorry... x_x no problem. someone should really update the documentation to make sure that os.spawn and os.open and commands and popen2 and all the other 80%-solutions at least point to the subprocess module... (and if the library reference had been stored in a wiki, I'd fixed that before any- one else even got this mail...) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4