RetroSearch Browse

Fri Oct 13 08:45:12 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-October/069391.html

Alexey Borzenkov wrote:

> P.S. Although it's a bit stretching, one might also say that
> implementing spawn*p* on windows is not actually a new feature, and
> rather is a bugfix for misfeature. Why every other platform can
> benefit from spawn*p* and only Windows can't? This just makes
> os.spawn*p* useless: it becomes unreliable and can't be used in
> portable code at all.

any reason you cannot just use the "subprocess" module instead, like 
everyone else?

</F>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-October/069391.html below:

[Python-Dev] Why spawnvp not implemented on Windows?