On Friday 13 October 2006 07:00, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Kristján V. Jónsson schrieb: > > This is an improvement of another 3.5 %. > > In all, we have a performance increase of more than 10%. > > Granted, this is from a single set of runs, but I think we should start > > considering to make PCBuild8 a "supported" build. > > What do you mean by that? That Python 2.5.1 should be compiled with > VC 2005? Something else (if so, what)? I don't think we should switch the "official" compiler for a point release. I'm happy to say something like "we make the PCbuild8 environment a supported compiler", which means we need, at a bare minimum, a buildbot slave for that compiler/platform. Kristján, is this something you can offer? Without a buildbot for that compiler, I don't think we can claim it's supported. There's plenty of platforms we "support" which don't have buildslaves, but they're all variants of Unix - I'm happy that they are all mostly[1] sane. Anthony [1] Offer void on some versions of HP/UX, Irix, AIX <wink> -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4