Barry Warsaw wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Oct 12, 2006, at 4:08 AM, Anthony Baxter wrote: > >> I've had a couple of queries about whether PSF-2006-001 merits a >> 2.3.6. >> Personally, I lean towards "no" - 2.4 was nearly two years ago now. >> But I'm >> open to other opinions - I guess people see the phrase "buffer >> overrun" and >> they get scared. >> >> Plus once 2.4.4 final is out next week, I'll have cut 12 releases >> since >> March. Assuming a 2.5.1 before March (very likely) that'll be 14 >> releases >> in 12 months. 16 releases in 12 months would just about make me go >> crazy. > > I've offered in the past to dust off my release manager cap and do a > 2.3.6 release. Having not done one in a long while, the most > daunting part for me is getting the website updated, since I have > none of those tools installed. I'm I the only one who feels that the website is a big workflow problem? Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4