skip> Most definitely. I just posted what I came up with in about two skip> minutes. I'll add some code to track the high water mark as well skip> and report back. Using the smallest change I could get away with, I came up with these allocation figures (same as before): -1.0: 29048 0.0: 524340 +1.0: 91560 rest: 1753479 whole numbers -10.0 to 10.0: 1151543 and these max ref counts: -1.0: 16 0.0: 136 +1.0: 161 rest: 1 whole numbers -10.0 to 10.0: 161 When I have a couple more minutes I'll just implement a cache for whole numbers between -10.0 and 10.0 and test that whole range of values right. Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4