On 9/30/06, Giovanni Bajo <rasky at develer.com> wrote: > It would be terrific if you gave us some clue about what is wrong in PEP355, so > that the next guy does not waste his time. For instance, I find PEP355 > incredibly good for my own path manipulation (much cleaner and concise than the > awful os.path+os+shutil+stat mix), and I have trouble understanding what is > *so* wrong with it. > > You said "it's an amalgam of unrelated functionality", but you didn't say what > exactly is "unrelated" for you. Sorry, no time. But others in this thread clearly agreed with me, so they can guide you. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4