Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Talin wrote: > >> But it isn't just the docs that are at fault here - otherwise, I'd be >> posting this on a different mailing list. It seems like the whole >> architecture is 'diff'-based, a series of patches on top of patches, >> which are in need of some serious refactoring. > > so to summarize, you want someone to rewrite the code and write new > documentation, and since you didn't even have time to make your post > shorter, that someone will obviously not be you ? Oh, it was a lot longer when I started :) As far as rewriting it goes - I can only rewrite things that I understand. > </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4