Armin Rigo wrote: > Yuk! Not renamed to .py files. Distributing .py files that are > actually bytecode looks like a new funny way to create confusion. No, I > was half-heartedly musing about introducing Yet Another file extension > (.pyc for caching and .pyX for importable bytecode, or possibly the > other way around). an alternative would be to only support source-less PYC import from ZIP archives (or other non-filesystem importers). </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4