Greg Ewing schrieb: > Fredrik Lundh wrote: > >> well, from a performance perspective, it would be nice if Python looked >> for *fewer* things, not more things. > > Instead of searching for things by doing a stat call > for each possible file name, would it perhaps be > faster to read the contents of all the directories > along sys.path into memory and then go searching > through that? That should never be better: the system will cache the directory blocks, also, and it will do a better job than Python will. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4