Steve Holden wrote: >> Ah, but how do you know when that's wrong? At least under ftp:// your >> root is often a mid-level directory until you change up out of it. >> http:// will tend to treat the targets as roots, but I don't know that >> there's any requirement for a /.. to be meaningless (even if it often >> is). >> > I'm darned if I know. I simply know that it isn't right for http resources. the URI specification disagrees; an URI that starts with "../" is per- fectly legal, and the specification explicitly states how it should be interpreted. (it's important to realize that "urijoin" produces equivalent URI:s, not file names) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4