Michael Urman wrote: > On 11/3/06, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote: > >> Having said this, Andrew *did* demonstrate quite convincingly that the >> current urljoin has some fairly egregious directory traversal glitches. >> Is it really right to punt obvious gotchas like >> >> >>>urlparse.urljoin("http://blah.com/a/b/c", "../../../../") >> >> 'http://blah.com/../../' > > > Ah, but how do you know when that's wrong? At least under ftp:// your > root is often a mid-level directory until you change up out of it. > http:// will tend to treat the targets as roots, but I don't know that > there's any requirement for a /.. to be meaningless (even if it often > is). > I'm darned if I know. I simply know that it isn't right for http resources. regards Steve -- Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://holdenweb.blogspot.com Recent Ramblings http://del.icio.us/steve.holden
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4