Steve Holden wrote: > Having said this, Andrew *did* demonstrate quite convincingly that the > current urljoin has some fairly egregious directory traversal glitches. > Is it really right to punt obvious gotchas like > > >>>urlparse.urljoin("http://blah.com/a/b/c", "../../../../") > > 'http://blah.com/../../' > > >>> > > to the server? See Paul Jimenez's thread about replacing urlparse with something better. The current module has some serious issues :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4